News
Alito's concerns about "loopholes" in the Supreme Court's universal injunctions ruling emerge as judges issue sweeping ...
President Donald Trump and his legal team eye next steps after the Supreme Court curbed lower court judges' ability to issue ...
"The Court has jurisdiction to enforce its preliminary injunctions to preserve the status quo, but it does not have ...
Unfortunately, lawmakers repealed it in 1976. Bring back the three-panel court for constitutional challenges.
The ruling is ideologically neutral and will apply when Republicans are in the minority and a Democrat occupies the White ...
By limiting the ability of a single judge to halt executive actions across the nation, the court has restored balance to the ...
4don MSNOpinion
Yesterday, in a 6–3 decision in Trump v. CASA, the United States Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case ...
The Supreme Court’s ruling in a case on birthright citizenship gave an ominous warning to those challenging other Trump ...
Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in Trump v. CASA, Inc. barring nationwide injunctions is a grave mistake. It ...
The recent decision of the Supreme Court denying the nation’s thousand-odd federal district judges the power, absent class action treatment, to grant nationwide injunctions has generated hysteria ...
Friday’s decision limits the circumstances under which the court can issue nationwide injunctions — orders that stop a federal law or policy from being enforced while court battles play out.
7don MSN
A divided Supreme Court has ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions, but the decision ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results